Gio Jang vs Laalitya Kalluri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Jul at 10:08 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Jang vs L. Kalluri

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jang 1 - 0 Kalluri
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gio Jang winning 2 and Laalitya Kalluri winning 0. The last match between Gio Jang and Laalitya Kalluri was at the W15 Nakhon Pathom, 20-07-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Gio Jang getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jang | 1 |
| Kalluri | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W15 Nakhon Pathom(07-20-25)
G. Jang vs L. Kalluri H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.44% (44-45) | Career Total W/L | 33.33% (33-66) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Jang vs L. Kalluri Match Preview:
- Jang's second serve win rate in recent months stands at 36.08%, slightly higher than Kalluri's 33.51%. Could this give Jang an edge in service games? It's possible, given the importance of this stat in match predictions.
- When it comes to return games, Jang has outperformed with a 53.29% win rate on opponents' second serves compared to Kalluri's 51.5%. Meanwhile, Kalluri holds an advantage on first serve returns with 36.68% over Jang's 30.65%. Does this mean Kalluri can exploit Jang's first serve?
- Analyzing pressure situations, Kalluri has saved a higher percentage of breakpoints at 49.45% compared to Jang's 47.62%. How might this impact the match? Kalluri may have a slight edge when defending breakpoints.
- Over the past year, Jang has a match win rate of 45.45%, slightly better than Kalluri’s 40%. This suggests a marginal overall performance superiority for Jang.
- Both players achieve their best results on hard surfaces, but Jang has a higher win rate of 52% compared to Kalluri's 35%. Could this inclination towards hard courts favor Jang?
- In terms of opponent quality, Jang has faced tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 78.64 versus Kalluri’s 129.12. Does playing stronger opponents prepare Jang better for this contest?
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Kalluri appears more resilient, winning 67% of such sets, whereas Jang has won 50%.
- Jang shows superior breakpoint conversion at 48.57% over Kalluri's 42.86%. Could this proficiency in capitalizing breakpoints aid Jang during crucial game moments?
Editorial Prediction (July 20, 2025, UTC):
As this match approaches, Jang's recent form on second serves and ability to face stronger competition provide a key advantage. Although Kalluri's resilience in deciding sets and proficiency in returning first serves should not be overlooked, these may not sufficiently tilt the balance.
With Jang holding a slight edge in several crucial stats, such as overall match win rate and breakpoint conversion, it's likely these factors could be significant in determining the outcome.
Considering the head-to-head comparison and relative strengths, Jang appears more prepared to capitalize on their strengths. Thus, based on the current data and performance indicators, Jang seems the more probable winner for this upcoming tennis match.
Gio Jang vs Laalitya Kalluri Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Jang vs L. Kalluri H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:34:55 | Average Match Time | 1:34:55 |
| 77% (41/53) | 1st Serve % | 65% (34/52) |
| 59% (24/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (18/34) |
| 75% (9/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (6/18) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 54% (28/52) | Return Points Win % | 38% (20/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Jang Recent Matches Played
L. Kalluri Recent Matches Played

G. Jang vs L. Kalluri Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.44% (44/45) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (33/66) |
| 47.47% (94/104) | Sets Win/Loss | 35.16% (77/142) |
| 48.39% (871/929) | Games Win/Loss | 42.34% (854/1163) |
| 51.39% (37/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 34.21% (26/50) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.43% (7/16) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 37 | Aces Total | 25 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.49 |
| 210 | Total Double Faults | 481 |
| 1:5:58 | Average Match Time | 1:9:40 |
| 269.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 167.8 |
| 52% (1787/3427) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2518/4297) |
| 58% (1029/1787) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (1335/2518) |
| 42% (681/1640) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (667/1779) |
| 51% (198/391) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (202/481) |
| 45% (1497/3292) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1792/4178) |
| 48.00% (12/13) | Challenger W/L | 31.71% (13/28) |
| 50.00% (32/32) | Futures W/L | 34.48% (20/38) |
| 49% (42/86) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (33/99) |
| 80% (4/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (7/11) |
| 59% (13/22) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 85% (41/35) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (32/27) |
| 15% (41/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (32/5) |
| 17% (48/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (67/6) |